AU

Meetings: For the family <i>and</i> their friends

 
Carl Laferton | 14 Oct 2011

Main point: Church is a place to be deliberately family-focussed and outsider friendly, at the same time.

Church is a family. Jesus Himself said “My mother and brothers are those who hear God’s word and put it into practice” (Luke 8 v 21).

But it’s an open family. Anyone can join, by receiving Jesus as Lord (John 1 v 12-13). And it’s a welcoming family. At the family get-togethers, what the family does is meant to attract outsiders (1 Corinthians 14 v 23-25).

THE GIRLFRIEND DIFFRENCE

Imagine the scene. It’s a suburban house, and the family are sitting down to their meal. Nothing special in that; but tonight is different. Johnny, the son, has brought his girlfriend, Sarah, round. It’s the first time his parents have met her—and the first time she’s met them.

How will the presence of Sarah make a difference? Well, in one sense, she won’t. The family is still the family, and she’s not part of it (yet—Johnny’s hopeful, though!). They still sit down at their dining table for food, at the normal time, in their normal places, eating food they like.

But in another sense, things are very different. Mum checked what food Sarah liked beforehand. Everyone introduced themselves to her. Dad made sure Sarah was included in the conversation. Her opinion was asked for and listened to.

BOTH-AND

Is this a helpful way to think about how our church gatherings should be? It’s a family occasion—with non-family members there. The family need feeding, but that never needs to be at the expense of being welcoming and accessible to non-Christians, listening to them and being relevant for them.

This isn’t an “either-or” (either church is for Christians, apart from the odd evangelistic service, or it’s a seeker service, for non-Christians, with nothing for mature believers). It’s a both-and (both for Christians and for newcomers).

ASK THE QUESTION

I wonder if the way to tell if a church is both-and is this: Would church members confidently bring a non-Christian friend on any Sunday, and know that they’ll be welcomed, feel listened to, and hear the gospel relevantly?

What might help the answer to that question be “yes”? A few suggestions:

  • Get every upfront speaker to tell the congregation their name. Without fail.
  • Ask whoever’s introducing to explain how long the meeting will last, what the meeting will include, and roughly how long each bit will last.
  • When preaching, always assume a non-Christian is listening. Think about how they will hear what you say, especially sections which talk about them.
  • Plan your services so people have the opportunity to say what they think, and to ask questions (back to how we teach).
  • Keep notices short, and done late in the service, so newcomers aren’t immediately hearing: “You’re not part of the family.”
  • Explain why the family sing, share Communion, pray, and listen to the Bible. Don’t use Christian jargon!
  • Minimise awkwardness for the newcomer. Is it helpful to a non-family member to stand and sing as the first thing they do? Would it help to stay seated to sing?

If Sarah chooses not to become part of the family, we want that to be because she decides she doesn’t love Johnny, not because his family put her off before she had a chance to work out how she felt about him! If a newcomer decides not to become part of our church family, let that be because they decide they don’t love the Lord Jesus—not because Jesus’ family put them off before they had the chance to work it out!

Practical suggestion: At your next Sunday service, try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who’s never been to church before. What would help you understand what was going on, feel included, and not awkward? What would help you feel valued and worthwhile, and as if you matter?

Kip' Chelashaw

11:01 PM AEDT on January 8th
Carl,

Thanks for a interesting post.

I'm uneasy about your analogy - comparing non-Christians to Johnny's girlfriend. The problem here is that in a Christian household, the right thing every parent should expect is for their children to be courting/dating/making 'special friends' with Christians not pagans. Thus when boyfriends/girlfriends comes over it shouldn't so much be a matter of thinking how do we make this outsider feel welcome but more how do we make this fellow member of God's family feel at ease.

I think a better analogy is to think of non-Christians not so much as the girlfriend/boyfriend of one of the household children but more like the friends they make while at junior/primary school. The sorts of friends who would come over knowing that the parents are 'boss' (BIG assumption I know!) and that while they (the little children) are very welcome in the Christian home, they should behave in a manner that accords with the house rules e.g no dirty shoes inside, no foul language, if you join us the Christian family for food, we pray before we eat and so on... The point here is that I'm not sure that Scripture recommends sounding out the pagans/eliciting their opinions on what works for them and doesn't for our church services. Think for example of the letters in the NT. If these were your typical sermons to the congregation, how do they fit your point that we shouldn't use Christian jargon? How would something like Ephesians fair? Secondly think of a passage like 1 Corinthians 14 where Paul commends Tongues as an evangelistic strategy! Now how "outsider" friendly is that?

Blessings.

Kip' Chelashaw

Carl Laferton

11:01 PM AEDT on January 8th
Hi Kip',
Thanks for your comment... I think I would still like to stick with the girlfriend analogy! My point isn't about whether Johnny's family are Christian or not, or about whether Sarah is or not. Actually, even if they are and she is, there will still be lots of ways in which they will need to include and involve her—and they'll (hopefully!) bear that in mind when she comes round. The analogy isn't perfect, of course, because no analogy is. And we will do things in church that might prove a barrier to non-Christians—Bible teaching, praying, Lord's Supper. My point, though, is that often we add barriers. The Bible doesn't say we have to stand to sing, but we do, and it's worth asking if that's a barrier. The Bible doesn't say we shouldn't say what our name is if we're doing something up front, but we often don't… and so on.
It's a good point about the letters Paul wrote to be read out to the church. Do you know if, when they were read, no one said anything afterwards about what they meant (as we do today, when we preach on an epistle)?
I think 1 Corinthians 14 actually is suggesting that we should think about how non-Christians see our meetings! The reason Paul gives for not speaking in tongues at the expense of prophesying is that an unbeliever will be confirmed in their unbelief by their incomprehension (v 22), because they'll think Christians are crazy (v 23)!
Hope that's helpful... I think this is actually quite an important question, because it strongly influences how we "do" both church and mission. Do others have thoughts? Do you prefer the girlfriend, the children, or another analogy?!!

Kip' Chelashaw

11:01 PM AEDT on January 8th
Carl,

Thanks for the reply.

I want to explore the barriers point a wee bit with the girlfriend analogy in mind. The question I had reading the above is if the Bible doesn't address an issue explicitly e.g. how we are to sing when we gather together, how are we to decide if it is a barrier or not and what part should the non-believer play in that decision? It seems to me if you're in a small-ish church and there are occasional non-believers who walk through the door it may be easy to work out reasonably precisely what things are barriers and what are not. However if you're in a HTB or St Helen's type church where they sometimes see lots and lots of unbelievers through their doors how will the church be able to work out what things are barriers and what are not? Me thinks that your girlfriend analogy works best in a fairly small-ish church where it's easy for the eldership etc to get to know the unbeliever but would not work even in a mid-sized church. I think too that it somewhat inadvertently puts the unbeliever in a place of undeserved privilege: asking them to play a part in deciding what should and shouldn't happen when God's people meet together as church. Another way of saying all this is that if Scripture is sufficient to direct all we do (and it is) then that should be the driver and benchmark for all that happens on the Lord's Day as we meet rather than perennially endeavouring to minimise the awkwardness for unbeliever/newcomer... As you say this is an important important issue.

Sincerely,

K

Carl Laferton

Carl is Editorial Director at The Good Book Company and is a member of Grace Church Worcester Park, London. He is the best-selling author of The Garden, the Curtain and the Cross and God's Big Promises Bible Storybook, and also serves as series editor of the God's Word for You series. Before joining TGBC, he worked as a journalist and then as a teacher, and pastored a congregation in Hull. Carl is married to Lizzie, and they have two children. He studied history at Oxford University.